1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Obama to Ask for End of Don't Ask, Don't Tell?

Discussion in 'Current Events, World News, & LGBT News' started by mmilam75, Jan 27, 2010.

  1. Sicsemper79

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Roanoke VA
    Might I suggest an opening line for this "controversial" executive order.

    "It is rare these days for the president to get to take decisive action to end true discrimination in this country. Today, it is my privilege to join the presidents before me who stood in the face of public pressure and moved our country closer to the ideals in which we ascribe. Today we end the enforcement of DADT via executive order. It is an antiquated and unfair piece of legislation and I call on congress to end it officially in their next session. This will be unpopular among some, but I ask those people to talk to the more than 12,000 American Patriots who this country turned their back on since the inception of this legislation. I defy any man to stand today in the face of freedom and respect for our servicemen in support of discrimination."

    Most Americans support the repeal of DADT anyway. So does the majority of the military. It is controversial, but done correctly, no one will dare stand against it.
     
  2. Sylver

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kenora, Ontario
    Well said.
     
  3. Lexington

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    11,409
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Colorado
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Too bad it won't be said.

    Lex
     
  4. Sicsemper79

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Roanoke VA
    Yup, not a chance. My only point is that it doesn't have to be all that controversial. Just man up and do it because its the right thing to do. Isn't that part of being the damn president?
     
  5. mmilam75

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Is it the political thing to do? No. But for a President who came to office pledging to “change the tone in Washington”, the Machiavellian approach is another example in which this President says one thing and does another. If I had been writing the speech, here’s the section, I would have written:

    “A fundamental civil rights issue central to our concept of America as the land of the free and the home of the brave is the idea that we are all equal before the law. Since the inception of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, we have fallen short of that ideal. In order to end that unjust practice, I will sign an Executive Order tomorrow morning which suspends enforcement of the practice known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell for the next 12 months, giving Congress time to act on my request to end the practice as a part of American law. Additionally, tonight I am announcing that Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department will suspend support of a lawsuit concerning this policy, and my Administration will support any and all efforts to bring this policy to a close through the legislative and judicial processes of this government. I call on the Armed Services committees in both chambers of Congress to conduct immediate hearings that will result in a military force where all Americans can serve openly and with the pride that comes from serving a cause greater than themselves, securing freedom and liberty for free peoples all across the globe.”

    Specific. Measurable. Achievable. And it leaves his opponents with little recourse but to act or risk public censure. But he won’t do that because he is not committed to us in any real way.
     
  6. NickT

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    567
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kentucky
    One thing I dislike when it comes to politics (among many), and this just really irks me, is when people say, "He's not going to do this," or even "He will do this." No one can predict the goddamn future so stop pretending you can. I say forget speculation about the negative effects of this or that legislation. At this point, I'm pretty sure we should be welcoming any effing plan someone has to fix the economy/war/whatEVER.
     
  7. Sylver

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kenora, Ontario
    Hot off the press (from CNN) - the Department of Defense has scheduled a major announcement for next Tuesday on DA/DT. Secretary Robert Gates himself is delivering it. Could this be it?
     
  8. Shevanel

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,403
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Little Neck, NY
    Source?
     
  9. Sylver

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kenora, Ontario
    I just heard it on Rick Sanchez on CNN like 5 minutes ago (I multitask :icon_bigg) - it was "Breaking News". Probably not on their website yet.

    ----------

    Now they didn't say what the announcement would be, only that it was "about Don't Ask Don't Tell". For all we know it could be an announcement that the military will set up a panel to study the issue with a report due in 11 months, etc. Wouldn't that be unusual...
     
  10. xCrazyInsanity

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South-East Pennsylvania
    I think -- to a point -- DADT is a good thing.

    Meaning, it doesn't MATTER what your sexuality is in the military, you're all fighting for the same thing.

    What actually should be done (In my not-so-humble opinion), is to remove being openly LGB (IE being married/civil union) as a reason to discharge someone from the miliitary
     
  11. Lexington

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    11,409
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Colorado
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    >>>Yup, not a chance. My only point is that it doesn't have to be all that controversial. Just man up and do it because its the right thing to do. Isn't that part of being the damn president?

    When'd that start? It's always been about making the party happy first, your special interests second, and your own personal agenda third. Doing the right thing only comes into play if it fits in with any or all of those.

    Lex
     
  12. Sicsemper79

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Roanoke VA
    Ugh... true. :bang::***:
     
  13. Lexington

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    11,409
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Colorado
    Gender:
    Male
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    [youtube]G6syG4Pm-RE[/youtube]

    I'm not saying all this to beat up on Obama. I've long maintained that rights for gays won't be obtained from the top down, but from the ground up. We can't look to the people at the top to come to our rescue. We have to do the gruntwork ourselves in order to get the rights we feel we deserve. Lots of doors opened for gays during the last decade, and during most of that, both the president and Congress were solidly Republican (and against the idea).

    Lex
     
  14. ANightDude

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    What the hell, John McCain? What you said contridicted your entire point.
     
  15. Gaetan

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    614
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Idaho, USA
    Any particular reason it shouldn't be abandoned, Mr. McCain? Besides that it's been in effect for so long--that's hardly a reason at all.
     
  16. Filip

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Belgium, EU
    Gender:
    Male
    Gender Pronoun:
    He
    Sexual Orientation:
    Gay
    Out Status:
    Out to everyone
    Well, the McCain quote does prove that, even if we will have to do a lot of the legwork ourselves, Obama was still the best choice of the two options given (looking from a purely GLBT standpoint).
    He might not be doing much to advance the matter, but at least he isn't actively working against it either.

    (I think that classifies as "damning with faint praise", though :lol:slight_smile:
     
  17. xCrazyInsanity

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    South-East Pennsylvania
    Because in everyone else's world, 'abandoning' the policy translates to "if we think you're gay, or know you're gay, you're out on dishonorable discharge"

    (and this why I can't join the military)
     
  18. Meropspusillus

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    597
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Actually, you can't join because you're 15. I'm sure DADT will be nullified by the time you're old enough anyways. =P.
     
  19. Zume

    Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Oakbank, Manitoba, Cañada
    DADT = My reason why I didn't join the military. I'd probably get kicked out before basic training was over :icon_wink hehe
     
  20. Emberstone

    Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,680
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    mccain would be out of office quickly if he didnt speak out against repealing DADT.