1 or 2 for me. Of course, that's only on looks, I wouldn't date someone without having some idea of personality/appropriateness etc.
5 looks like he's made of porcelain. I would go with 2, but I don't like the way he's looking at me. I choose 1.
(starts panting like a dog) Number 2. NUMBER 2! NUMBER 2!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST GIVE ME NUMBER 2!!!!!!!!! (slurp)
5 is kinda creepy, and Jedward is out of the question (eww Simon Cowell spawn), and although I hate vloggers in general, I can't deny the fact that Jack and Finn are adorable and I'll have to go with them like everyone else (man they're hot).
None really, in a pinch, #1 ---------- Post added 26th Jul 2013 at 08:41 PM ---------- You'd like me better.
I find this comment a little hurtful. Mainly because I see myself in him. He's about my age. I wear glasses. I've got a beard and it's getting more grey with each passing day. I'm not built like a model. So in the looks department, he and I get an "lol" when it comes to dating. But here's what I, and probably he, have to offer: We've got life experiences and can talk about a wide variety of topics. We know we aren't models, so we appreciate the fact that someone who takes interest in us is attracted to our personalities rather than the more superficial aspects of our selves. We've been around the block a time or two, so we know how to party. We also know when it's time for the party to end. We know how to make love, not just have sex. We've grown older and wiser and we've seen that looks fade but hearts get stronger. We've learned the value of kindness. Our parents lied to us when they taught us about sticks and stones. Because words can cut deeply and leave scars that never heal.
Khan, as much as you find the comment a little hurtful, I really doubt that DB meant it to come off that way. I don't think he was laughing at this looks of him, but more rather observing the fact that no one has commented on #3 yet. So he wasn't so much "lol"'ing at the complexion of him, but rather the fact that was stated in the previous sentence.
Oh this is an obvious one. #2 is unbelievably hot. Also, @KhanSaheb: You bring up a good point, however for most of us #3 is old enough to be our dad. There's nothing inherently wrong with that - some people do like older guys - but it's not the case for most. Also, while #3 may have an amazing personality and life experiences, that can't really be assumed from a picture. If a biography of each person was included, then maybe that would be possible.
Um, 2, OBVS. Jack (and Finn) for the win! :love: I'd take either of them...or maybe two for the price of one? How is this even a question?
The real life answer for me is none of them as I go for the country rough manly type (redneck). 1 and/ or 2 maybe if they were killer to hang with when I was young and had never met Michael. Now at 41 I am way too old for either to want me even if I was inclined to date either. After all could you see either one of them in public with me? They likely would be embarrassed! June
Ha, how would you know that without talking to each of them? :lol: Why do we assume there is automatically an inverse relationship between physical attractiveness and personality appeal?
#3. Would be my honest answer; if he wasn't stuck on himself. Those other boys are cute but it would feel like robbing the cradle to date them.
